Is Youth Hockey Doing the
Right Things?
By Wally Shaver, Let's Play Hockey Newspaper
Wouldn't it be great if we could get back to the good
ole days of hockey and relive those moments of "old time hockey."?
But what is old time hockey? I know young people who
think it was the high scoring era of the 1980's when Wayne Gretzky was piling up 150 and
200-point seasons like it was nothing.
Others go back to the goon squads of the 1970's when
the Filthydelphia Flyers and Big Bad Bruins were beating up everyone in sight. Older folks
will harken back to the old 6-team NHL era when virtually every game had to played like it
was your last because there was a waiting list seven deep at every position.
Old time hockey has an entirely different definition
when applied to youth hockey these days.
As Minnesota Gophers head coach Don Lucia said,
"there is far too much parental involvement in the game today - and that's true of
all sports. Too many parents are living their kid's dreams - they push their kids too
much. It's like a horse race to get their kid to the next level." Boy isn't that the
truth.
Remember in the olden days when kids would go down to
the outdoor rink and join in a pick-up game and just skate for hours on end.
Big kids, little kids and everyone in between. Some
call it pond hockey. Some call it shinny. To those of us who played it this way, we just
called it hockey.
"Everything is so organized and programmed these
days that the kids don't have an opportunity to just be kids," said the coach of the
defending national college hockey champs. "It used to be the kids would do it
themselves. They'd go down to the rink and play by themselves or get a pick-up game
organized. They didn't have video games, DVD's or computers - or a coach telling them what
to do. They played to occupy time."
"It will never go back - that's the reality of
hockey today," Lucia continued. "What has happened is, we aren't producing elite
players in Minnesota. We don't see the Broten's coming along anymore. We're not producing
enough Jeff Taffe's and Jordan Leopold's - the real skilled players. We produce good
players but not many elite ones and I don't really know why."
Any parent over 35 can make some easy assumptions.
Sure, today's youth have many more options for their time - mostly of the high tech
variety: videos, Internet, electronic games. There are a greater variety of activities
available - usually organized by goody-goody parents who think their kid has to have
everything. And that leads to a bigger and broader problem.
"There are too many people that are running hockey
that think they know what's best for the kids when they don't. There isn't a lot of
continuity. You have parents who want to coach their kids or sit on a board who make the
decisions then when their kids move on, they drop out and a new philosophy takes
over," said Lucia.
At some point, there has to be self-analysis. There
must be a better way. Why do college and pro coaches harp on the same thing: we have a
lack of good skilled players. It's a problem endemic in the U.S. and Canada.
Why does it seem all the high skill players in the NHL
these days come from Europe. Look at the leading scorers in the NHL - a disproportionate
number of them are Europeans compared to the numbers of Europeans in the league.
Ask any NHL scout where the top ranked draft-eligible
players in the world are coming from - Europe. Why is that?
The European approach to the game is different than
here in North America. Earlier this year I wrote a story on Thomas Vanek - the talented
18-year old freshman player for the Gophers. He's from Graz, Austria and the first
European to ever skate for the Golden Gophers. You know what his dad does for a living?
He's a career, full-time hockey coach. At the youth hockey level.
As Lucia said, "the best coaches in Europe are at
the youth level. It allows for continuity year to year and you get a good coach year to
year. They know what's best. They're into development, not politics or coaching just
because their kid is on the team. People here get way to caught up in wins. But who cares?
Winning and losing only matter at the end of the year. The emphasis should be on, 'are the
kids getting better? And, how is their skill development progressing.' That's how hockey
should be measured."
This year's edition of the Gophers is a prime example.
No, they aren't as deep with skill players like last years' group who won the national
title.
Losing players like Jordan Leopold, Johnny Pohl, Adam
Hauser, Jeff Taffe and Nick Angel left the team with gaping holes in experience, talent
and leadership. This years' Gophers are still a very good team and one of the better
squads in college hockey.
After savoring the title last year for a couple of
weeks, the Gophers got back to work.
"We knew we were going to be a much different
team. Our emphasis from the start has been to steadily improve and experiment during the
season with the goal of making the NCAA playoffs. Then we'll see what happens," said
Lucia. That's where the winning and losing really counts. That's what the Gophers are
preparing for.
As Lucia continued, "hockey is not rocket science.
Its not all X's and O's and positioning and systems. The team with the skills are usually
going to win. So why not put the emphasis on skill development instead of playing all
these games. In Europe, there is much more emphasis on skill development and practice
time. There's not a lot of team stuff until the peewee level. They don't worry about
getting 50 or 60 games in with a bunch of tournaments."
Don Lucia has some outstanding points for hockey
coaches, administrators and youth coordinators to ponder:
* "Why do mites play full ice hockey? Why
not play small ice hockey and learn stick skills? Players can always learn position."
* "We can do a better job of ice
utilization. I cringe when I see a team with 14 skaters out there using a full sheet of
ice. Most of it is wasted. Practice time can be far more productive."
* "Why not have 3 or 4 teams on the ice,
especially at the mite and squirt level. Play cross-ice games where the kids are in a
smaller space and will learn skating and stick skills. Play shinny hockey - there would be
a lot more development."
* "Associations should have minimum
skating requirements for kids trying out for teams. Kids should be lumped together based
on ability, not age - especially at the mite and squirt levels. Put them out there where
they can touch the puck and be out with kids of their own ability."
* "Why is there so much emphasis on travel
teams? Young kids at the squirt level don't need to travel. In-house is a much better
deal."
*"You have to put a puck on a kids stick.
They'll get more reps and feel more comfortable with the puck. Why not play shinny games
in a smaller space?"
I think anyone with a good
understanding of the game realizes this. I'd like to know then, why do we have so many
bozos doing the opposite? Why do we have so many parents who think they know it all
continuing to do the wrong thing? I don't know. I guess it's the just the way it is.
In a nutshell, youth hockey
should reduce games, add practice time and work on skill development - particularly at the
mite and squirt levels. Coaches in youth hockey who think they know it all should get a
clue and become better informed - the problem is, the one's who need it the most, don't
get it.
As Lucia summed up the
over-organization and over-parenting of youth hockey, "that's part of the reality of
hockey today. It'll never go back. I'd advise parents to save the money on travel hockey,
put the money in the bank and save it for their kids' college tuition instead of trying to
play for a scholarship."
I think we all need to
remember what we as adults did as kids. We went down to the local outdoor rink and played
shinny. It was a time when kids were kids - not programmed robots who needed adults to
tell us what to do every two minutes. Old time hockey.
Reprinted with permission
fron Let's Play Hockey newspaper.